The Shakti reports do not measure the actual performance of an individual. It is essential to note that the Shakti Reports measure the natural energy one’s Personality/Swabhav provides for performance. The CB5 - online Personality Test is used to generate various SHAKTI reports for variety of usesĬareer guidance, Leadership Development, Managerial Effectiveness, Sales Orientation, Operational efficiencies, Interpersonal and Team Development and various other possibilities. The SHAKTI Report gives the user an understanding and measure of natural energies one possesses towards performance.
In the free report you wont be pigeonholed into a single type, but you will learn how you score on the big five personality traits and learn what 30 subscales exist. It is also used commercially by psychologists, career counselors, and other professionals that conduct personality assessment. In addition the CB5 Psychometric Test has been used to develop a suite of SHAKTI Reports. This free personality test is fast and reliable. Aspects such as extroversion/introversion, thinking/feeling are measured and are considered relatively fixed.
The CB5 online Psychometric Test is based on the Big5 Model of Personality. What is a Psychometric Test There are many tests that focus on an individual’s personality. It is this innate Personality that drives the behavior of an individual and constitutes a major element that influences outcomes in various situations.ĬB5 Psychometric Test is used to measure Personality/Swabhav. Implications of these findings are discussed.Every individual is born with a Personality or Swabhav, that serves as the source of one’s natural Shakti to excel in various contexts in life. Again alpha levels were low, intercorrelations not as predicted and the factor structure unclear. A third experiment used the original scale with the original ipsative scoring system using full-time managers as subjects. Team-role scores did not correlate significantly with a large number of demographic factors any more than may be expected by chance. Again the alpha coefficients were modest and the factor analysis suggested a more simple solution than suggested.
The second experiment attempted a similar non-ipsative analysis with the more recent 70-item version of the questionnaire which has nine team roles. The alpha coefficients for the eight roles were not impressive and factor analysis did not provide clear evidence of the proposed structure. The original 56-item inventory was given to over 100 people from a variety of backgrounds in a non-ipsative Likert scaling form. This paper set out to examine the psychometric properties of the extensively used, but little tested, Belbin (1981) Team-Role Self-Perception Inventory which examines how people behave in teams.
0 kommentar(er)
